Sunday, January 29, 2017

Inequality


The theme that seemed to bring the readings and the video together for me this week, was inequality and the way it has changed over the years but never gone away. This ever present inequality is what makes social workers pursuit of social justice so important. Somehow people have forgotten that human beings have differences but that those differences should not make us unequal. As Therborn points out, there is a dissimilarity between inequality and differences. While we can never change the existence of human differences, we as social workers can fight to change inequality everyday (whether it’s a futile fight or not). One example of the inequalities that Therborn talks about is the inequality of life and death. There are multiple factors that contribute to this inequality but socioeconomic status is an important one. People who have little money or even those born into the wrong country have very limited options when it comes to healthcare. Things like basic checkups, emergency care, and dental are often times not available. As someone who grew up on Medicaid and currently has no health insurance, this inequality has affected my life personally and I can speak to how difficult it is to take care of yourself when you don’t have the right financial support.

Just like I cannot change how much money my family has, no one can change their race or their ethnicity and yet this difference continues to cause inequality in a myriad of ways. Johnson and Diaz both speak on privilege, specifically white privilege. Junot Diaz explained that the colored population that he refers to as “New America,” represents a large percent of the population and yet they were still being domineered by white Americans.

I believe that white privilege has never been as prominent in the twenty-first century as it is now, in Donald Trump’s America. Since Trump has taken office he has made what Therborn called exclusion the new precedent. Trump has taken away the rights of Middle Eastern people by denying them access to the United States. This is especially detrimental to Middle Eastern refugees who are seeking asylum in the United States. It seems that Trump is able to get away with this by convincing certain Americans that we have to focus on American issues and that the rest of the world can deal with their own problems. This is the exact opposite of the social justice solutions that Johnson talks about. Johnson talks about needing to see that privilege is everyone’s problem and that is supersedes race, ethnicity, and SES. He goes on to say that when those with privilege recognize that there is a problem and take responsibility for it that they can change inequality. In America today that would require Donald Trump to take responsibility for the inequality that he is causing, which I do not see happening. In light of this, I would argue that it is more important then, for those of us who value social justice to fight for it in ways that we deem possible.

1 comment:

  1. Hi Brittany! I really enjoyed all the positive points you brought to light, and some really stood out to me. I like how you brought up Therborn’s point on the dissimilarity between inequality and differences and your follow up statement. I always felt like the differences should be recognized but should not determine our place in society since we can’t really change our background. I agree that as social workers it is our job to fight back the injustices and brought upon the people that are discriminated against. I really appreciate you writing a little about your financial background growing up, thank you! You writing about your own experiences makes your post more genuine since you can heavily relate to those who are going through a similar situation. Towards the end of your post you mention Trump would not be taking responsibility for the inequality he is causing and I also believe that he will not; he has many followers and supporters, but the one good positive thing I see coming out of this entire situation is that the country will be tired of having a president like himself, so we will probably elect the most progressive president next! People want to see a change for the better within their communities and throughout the country and once all his supporter realize that he, in fact, does not care about them they will want someone who is the opposite of him! Far too much negative change has already occurred, and even though it is appealing to many of his supporters, they will see that everything he is messing up will greatly affect communities and businesses surrounding them.

    ReplyDelete